My computer dictionary defines empathy as “the ability to understand and share the feelings of another.” We are not born with this ability. We learn it. I am a very sensitive and empathetic person myself, sometimes to a fault, and whether or not it always happens, I feel that it is very very important to BE ABLE to “put yourself in someone else’s shoes.” It could be argued, in fact, that the “…understanding of others, empathy for others is the foundation of a functioning society.” (Catterall, 2011, interview.) If empathy is learned behavior, then how do we teach it? How to do instill this valuable response in the youth of today who will grow up to be the big people of tomorrow? Let’s ask James.
I met Dr. James Catterall six months ago. He is down-to-earth, quiet and kind. James has been a professor at UCLA for 30 years, and is a “principal investigator” at the Center for Research on Creativity, a fairly new “research and development institution dedicated to understanding human creativity and the conditions that can promote imaginative approaches to learning, design, and problem solving.” (www.croc-lab.org) Ummm… AWESOME!
Dr. Catterall began working in the field of art education with the intention to make schools a more interesting and fun place for kids to be. After bearing witness to the positive influence art activities and creative problem solving brought to the classroom, Dr. Catterall went on to conduct a 12 year study, involving over 12,000 middle-schoolers. He followed them thru high school, on in to college, thru age 26, recording their successes in academia as well as within the general community after graduation. He then compared the “success” rates between those that participated in the arts while in school, and those that did not. Dr. Catterall, after 12 years of comparing data and crunching numbers, described the results as “unambiguous.” Across the board, students that participated in a creative endeavor went on to become more “successful” adults.
He published these results in a book called “Doing Well and Doing Good by Doing Art.” The “doing well” part of the study referred to academia and what kind of college, if any, the student went on to attend. The “doing good” part of the study was measured by community/political participation, religious/service activities, and efforts to volunteer while in school and after graduation. James uses the term “pro-social behaviors” to describe these “good” efforts.
Back to empathy:
Beyond the book, James and colleagues took these findings one-step further. In an article published in September of 2011 titled “A Neuroscience of Art and Human Empathy,” Catterall explains that pro-social behaviors are most always “grounded in empathy.” This means that understanding and caring about society will move a person to become involved in improving the lives of others. Logical. THAT idea, coupled with the data collected from the 12-year study revealing the connection between art and pro-social behaviors led James and colleagues to continue researching. THIS is what they found:
“The brain areas that are activated by empathetic behavior are (also) activated by various artistic experiences and artistic processes. “ (Catterall, 2011, Interview)
What?!? There is a connection between the neuroscience of human empathy and the neuroscience of art? Yes! And through this connection James concludes that there is now a“ …neurological argument for why the arts may promote pro-social behavior.” (Catterall, 2011, “A Neuroscience of Art and Human Empathy”)
This is a powerful discovery and honestly, I didn’t understand the extent of its application until I let it settle a bit. Will this information influence techniques teachers utilize in the classroom? Could creative problem solving become a bigger part of our children’s school curriculum? Will music and art teachers be valued again? Empathy is a learned response, so if children are given more artistic opportunities, will they begin to exhibit empathetic behavior at a younger age? Will teachers experience less fights on the playground, hear less arguments, see fewer bullies? Could we create the creative environment that will give children the ability to “wear each other’s shoes?”
And then I thought about the chicken again. 
Dr. James Catterall has uncovered information that strongly suggests art in its many forms may be literally working to help kid’s brains operate in an empathetic way; Art may be helping our kids grow into better human beings.
Sometimes when it comes to getting the attention of “the people,” numbers speak louder than words. Thank you James, for spending the last 12 years doing the research, gathering the information, crunching numbers, and drawing up ever-harder-to-ignore charts and graphs. Your article urging continued research on the neurological connection between art and empathy is ground breaking and in my humble opinion, could change the world.
May your research on pro-social behavior, art, and empathy soon have an impact on the funding our art education programs receive here in California and across the nation.
Learn about Centers for Research on Creativity here.
Read Dr. James Catterall’s “A Neuroscience of Art and Human Empathy” here.
Watch Dr. James Catterall’s interview on “One to One” with Bill Goodman here.












